Viewpoint

Proclamation finally decrees equality for Ethiopian Muslims

Legislation in June recognizing the Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council was a historic progressive move by the State for the Muslim community.

On 11 June, the House of People’s Representatives (the House) approved a bill to legally establish the Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council (EIASC, aka the majlis), a move with overarching positive implications for Ethiopian Muslim society

Up until this day, a single religious society has maintained unrivalled legal status before the Ethiopian State.

The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church’s continued special legal personality originates from articles 389 and 407 of the 1960 Civil Code. It marks a direct recognition of the church as a legal entity that can form organizations affiliated to it, and it was not subject to annual renewal.

Following the latest parliamentary approval, this number has now risen to three, adding the Ethiopian Gospel believers. The House granted legal status to the Ethiopian Evangelical Churches Council,

Finally, Ethiopia has officially recognized and integrated its religious elements. Post-1991 Ethiopia now becomes a multi-religious State, as it has been a multinational one.

Societal equality

The imperial era mantra that went “ሀገር የጋራ ነው፣ ሃይማኖት የግል ነው”, which means “country belongs to all; religion is personal”, has been a living memory, a counterfactual, until now. Because of this, the House’s glad tiding is the real deal that the old and the new generations are equally upbeat about.

Yet the move has less to do with the troubled majlis and more to do with the mass of Ethiopian Muslims. The majlis institution has for long been seen as anything but a sui generis spiritually Muslim in the eyes of the Ethiopian Muslims, and it is something they hardly identify themselves with.

The malfeasance of the majlis, rooted in lacking any shared vision and its institutional ineptitude, is one thing. But it is quite another, and a most damning one, when it stands against Muslims’ shared identity and becomes instrumental to the State’s repressive policies against the community.

It did this by giving overt support to measures the Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) government took.

In fact, many Muslims likened the majlis to one of the State’s ministries mandated to target Muslims. The majlis behaved and acted as part of the State security apparatus. The last three decades of its institutional history in particular manifest this. And that is why many Ethiopian Muslims resisted impressively and peacefully in late 2011.

The State’s act in the House is, thus, way beyond the mere commendable de jure precedence to authoritatively consent to the legal establishment of the Ethiopian Islamic Affairs Supreme Council (EIASC). Instead, for the wider Ethiopian Muslim community, this is a fundamental issue tied to the antique existence, underlying identity, unfettered equality, and fair justice as a religious community vis-à-vis the Ethiopian State.

Equality milestones

Two milestones are relevant to the Ethiopian Muslims’ question.

The first episode connects us with the 20th Century revolution marked by the demise of the empire that closed one key chapter about the question of State-Religion relations in Ethiopia. The other highlights the opening of a new chapter in the question of State-Religion relations and religious equality

In the mid-1970s, while the revolution was gathering pace, Ethiopian Muslims flooded the capital demanding the separation of State and Religion. The pre-revolution State-Religion relations served mutual political and economic interests.

One of the key instances powerful enough to capture such marriage could be that, the Church symbolized the Christianity of the State through the established official status the 1955 constitution provided under article 126. In exchange, the name of the Emperor should be mentioned in all religious services. Such an enduring bond that glued the two actors ultimately faced the wave of popular anger demanding change, including Ethiopian Muslims.

As historians  noted, it was their chant “ሀገር የጋራ ነው፣ ሃይማኖት የግል ነው” and the demand for equal status for their religion that reverberated. Shocked by the biggest demonstration which brought about onto the streets over 100,000 people, members of the aristocracy reacted strongly. The reaction was interpreted as a critical challenge that continued to undermine the historical position of the State.

The legitimate rights that Ethiopian Muslims demanded were critical to once again delegitimize the exclusivist discourse that had been reigning for centuries. Characterizing the discourse as unrepresentative to the wider Ethiopian polity, Muslims called for its disempowerment and for setting the State free so that it remains neutral and able to provide equal status to them.

The Muslims served as a key positive force that contributed to the 1974 revolution. Subsequently, the Ethiopian State dethroned the monarchic regime and turned a new chapter that parted ways with religion under the socialist military junta, the Derg.

As for the question of equal status, of becoming a directly recognized organized religious society and a judicial body that Ethiopian Muslims were equally struggling for, they had to wait until late 2011 when a critical juncture recurred in their history of oppression.

The Muslims’ renewed, but again seriously organized, demand for equal status resurfaced in December 2011, a part of the landmark peaceful struggle known as Dimtsachin Yisema. It all began when Ethiopian Muslims uncovered an Ethiopian government plot that targeted their autonomy and identity.

Historic repression

The EPRDF government was about to undertake an attack against Ethiopian Muslims in collaboration with the majlis. The government sponsored and invited a little known, ‘moderate’, sect headquartered in Lebanon, al Ahbash. This sought to alter the foundational beliefs and practices of Ethiopian Muslims that the State labelled as an existential threat. Foiling this ill-fated State-led operation, Muslims converged around a common cause, regardless of their differences.

The affair recalled two related incidents that occurred in Muslims’ history of oppression in Ethiopia: major mass conversion incidents, one in Wollo and the other in the now Ethiopian Somali region.

The first occurred in the late nineteenth century when Emperor Yohannes IV forced Wollo Muslims to desert Islam in an edict that says “now, let all Muslim[s] be baptized [and] become Christian.” Emperor Haile Selassie I always sought the same but acted off the record through systematically institutionalized channels. And this transpired to be the worst oppression Muslims ever suffered. A circular letter disclosed that the State would be pleased to see “the Somalis embrace Baha’ism religion than they remained adherents of Islam.”

While the Dimtsachin Yisema resistance was part of peaceful struggle for all Ethiopians, the stories resonated much more strongly with the Ethiopian Muslims and in particular the young generation.

Despite the aggressive nature of the State’s approaches to impose a foreign sect on Ethiopian Muslims, the modus operandi they opted for to push back was remarkable. Unperturbed, wise, and strategically organized, the Muslims remained steadfast to the principles of peaceful struggle. In a few months, as happened in 1974, the Muslim’s peaceful struggle won the hearts and minds of a significant segment of the polity that seek serious change.

They were all supportive of the cause and its inspirational methods which encouraged them to build upon for more purely political causes. As the only enduring challenge against the police state since the 2005 national election, political leaders and analysts praised the resistance’s nature and acknowledged the key role it played in the run-up to the EPRDF’s demise.

Now, the House’s June decree to grant equal status is the best answer of all recent answers the Ethiopian State came up with in the modern history of its Muslim citizens.

Implications of the proclamation

Apart from the grand historical significance discussed above, the proclamation has other benefits worth highlighting.

Firstly, it jettisons the age-old and State-led securitization of Islam and Ethiopian Muslims by shining light on the historic longevity of Islam in the land, a history that the State should take pride in as it does with Christianity. It is a well-established historical fact that Islam as a religion came to this land only after Mecca, where it was revealed.

Academic Adam Kamil, who dedicates his life to  studying and speaking about Ethiopia’s place and image in Islam, argues that Islam’s advent to Ethiopia equals justice. He asserts Ethiopia introduced the concept of treating migrants to the world 1,400 years ago. He suggested that this prototypical experience should be incorporated into the country’s broader history, if not utilized as a viable model in a global politics ridden by a refugee and migrant crisis.

Granting de jure equal status to its religions helps not only Ethiopian Muslims to proudly reclaim their rich history, but also helps the State reposition itself in world history that matches its antiquity.

Secondly, it glorifies Ethiopian Muslims as a religious society whose ontological existence is as old as the touching of Islam in Ethiopia.

The historical foundation of the Islamic community in Ethiopia is linked to the locals who welcomed members of the First Hijra and accepted Islam. Ethiopia’s contributions to Islam are ubiquitous in archives, yet its community and the State alike have no centrally administered collective ownership. The adoption of proclamation thus helps the Ethiopian Muslims remobilize and focus their efforts to re-identify themselves as a strong apolitical society rooted in its rich history, the State’s history.

Thirdly, the legal provision mirrors the magnitude of the present demography of Ethiopian Muslims. The significant proportion of Ethiopia as a polity is constituted by adherents of Islam. The number is such a large numerical value that deserves a parallel legal recognition through which apolitical activities of the society could be executed without facing legal hurdles and impediments by hostile officials.

Over the past several decades, even the majlis was subject to an annual renewal. The whole idea of going through such a complex institutional process undermined the grace of Ethiopian Muslims. But importantly, it practically precluded the majlis from behaving and functioning as a wider umbrella because this likens it with other NGOs whose organizational competence requires accreditation. The equal status provides the Ethiopian Muslims legal ground to see their umbrella spiritual organization differently from regular NGOs.

The last, semi-politically relevant point, is about ending a siege mentality.

Granting equal status to Ethiopian Muslims alters hostile mindsets and works against the perception of them as a threat. It deconstructs the legal and moral grounds that have been deployed by some agents, importantly the State and some regional states, to understand and treat Ethiopian Muslims as such.

The decree should serve as a key instrument for Ethiopian Muslims to reclaim their shared identity as an apolitical community. As an important precedent, the legal gateway should help Ethiopian Muslims come to a unity centered on their rich history, episteme, arts, and, crucially, their country, Ethiopia.

Query or correction? Email us

Follow Ethiopia Insight

This is the author’s viewpoint. However, Ethiopia Insight will correct clear factual errors.

Main photo: The 7th century Negash Amedin Mosque in Tigray, which is believed to be one of Africa’s oldest; Wikipedia.

Editors: Bona Geshe, William Davison.

Join our Telegram channel

Published under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence. Cite Ethiopia Insight and link to this page if republished. 

We need your support to analyze news from across Ethiopia
Please help fund Ethiopia Insight’s coverage
Become a patron at Patreon!

About the author

Endris Mekonnen

Endris is a lecturer in International Relations at the International University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Currently, he is a research fellow at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

3 Comments

  • Well-done Edris. This is an excellent piece.

    Ethiopia’s survival guaranted only if accommodates interests of different religions and ethnic identities

    Please share experuence of disintegration of Yugoslavia.

    Thank you

  • Excellent and to point Endris. I couldn’t have put it better way. Besides the legal, moral and cultural victories to Ethiopian Muslims and Ethiopian people in general, this gives Muslims an equal footing with other major religion in the land and its institutions .As regarding to the past abuses and state discrimination stacked agains muslims ,the damages done on the was systematic and extensive, be it education, economic equal rights and opportunities under the law. H/Selassie and Melez regimes were the worest offenders and they were two sides of the same coin while Derg was less laissez affair or less adversarial to all religious issues. The except was perhaps that it had to wrestle with or untangle the Orthodox Church, which deeply iinbeded in the imperial institution and the State power structure and in which confrontation was inevitable .Also while Haile Selassie sanctioned and formally institutionalized the injustice and discrimination of the Islamic faitb , the Woyane and Melez’s policy was the most insidious,, mean-spirited, manipulative and monetized scheme ever seen. Projections and tokenism aside, I believe that Melez & co, and majority Tigrai people in general , have serious and deep-seated complex against Ethiopian muslims . While the Amhara and other groups have mild sentiments against due to natural human ompetitions, not to mention having large segment of their own of being muslims, the Tigrain malevolence and hatred are beyond the limits. The irony is the they are the first ones who run to these same people and ask for help, be it Sudan, Arabs, Somalia and so on, when the going gets tough. These see this as a simple transactional and one dimensional relations but no as a neighbor, historical or other human relations.Thanks Almighty that Ethiopian
    Will never will heard again that a leader who is supposed to lead citizens and whole nation would say in the national TV or radio in the Eid occasion ba Ethiopia wust yeminorut islimoch … or the muslism living in Ethiopia, not Ethiopian Muslims , as if they were alien status in their own land, as reportedly Haile used to say countless times..

  • Excellent and to point Endris. I couldn’t have put it better way. Besides the legal and moral and cultural victories to Ethiopian Muslims and Ethiopian people in general, this gives Muslims an equal footing with other major religion in the land and its institutions .As regarding to the past abuses and state discrimination stacked agains muslims ,the damages done on the Muslims was systematic and extensive, be it education, economic equal opportunities under the law. H/Selassie and Melez regimes were the worest and the sides of the same coin while Derg was less laissez affair or less adversarial to all religious issues. The except was perhaps that it had to wrestle or untangle the Orthodox Church, which deeply iinbeded in the imperial institution and the State power structure and in which confrontation was inevitable .Also while Haile Selassie sanctioned and formally institutionalized the injustice and discrimination of the Islamic faitb , the Woyane and Melez’s policy was the most insidious,, mean-spirited, manipulative and monetized scheme ever seen. Projections and tokenism aside, I believe that Melez & co, and majority Tigrai people in general , have serious and deep-seated momplex against . While Amhara and other groups have mild sentiments due to natural human ompetitions, not to mention having large segment of their own of being muslims, the Tigrain malevolence and hatred are beyond the limist. The irony is the they are the first ones run to these same people and ask for help, be it Sudan, Arabs, Somalia and so on, when the going gets tough. These see this as a simple transactional relations but no as as neighbor, historical or other human relations.Thanks Almighty that Ethiopian
    neverr heard again that leader supposed to lead citizens and nation would say in the national TV or radio in the Eid occasion la Ethiopia wust yeminorut islimoch or muslism living in Ethiopia, not Ethiopian Muslims , as if they were alien in their own land, as reportedly Haile used to say countless times..

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.