The end game may be approaching in a long and bitter rivalryLast month there was a grand celebration in Tigray, the northernmost region of Ethiopia, on the occasion of the 45th anniversary of the founding of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), the rebel movement that assumed state power in 1991. But this was no regular celebration. It took place at a time when the TPLF has been ousted from the pinnacle of that power by reforms it claimed it initiated but were then snatched away.
Even during its rebellion, the TPLF never felt as threatened as it does now in Ethiopia by forces it labels “parasitic”. In the last two years, it saw a coalition it built and controlled for over three decades crumble before its eyes. However, the main threat to the TPLF does not come only from this domestic trauma. In fact, its greater cause concern is its northern neighbor, Eritrea.
The Red Sea state of Eritrea was an Italian colony from 1888-1942. After Britain, a victor in World War II, ruled for another decade, it was federated with Ethiopia by the decision of a United Nations Mandate in 1952. Another ten years on, the leader of Ethiopia, Emperor Haile Selassie I, annexed it, an action many believe catalyzed Eritrea’s 30-year guerilla struggle for independence.
The now-President of Eritrea, Isaias Afwerki, who led the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front (EPLF) rebellion, and TPLF created a sometimes-fractious tactical alliance in the 1980s to overthrow the Marxist military regime of Mengistu Hailemariam, which they succeeded in doing in 1991. Their relationship, however, started to sour, primarily over economic issues, only a few years after Eritrea seceded from Ethiopia and TPLF settled in Addis Ababa. This eventually resulted in the disastrous conflict from 1998-2000. Those who analyzed the cause of that war tend to agree that the personality and political vision of President Isaias had a lot to do with the descent into war.
Though Isaias fought for Eritrean nationhood, he often expressed his disdain for independence movements other than the one he led. In an interview conducted in 1990 by American historian and researcher Paul Henze, former Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, an ally of Eritrea at the time, hinted at Isaias’ dilemma even over Eritrea’s independence. According to Henze, “…Meles judges the attitude of the [Eritrean] population to be so negative that it constitutes a problem for EPLF leadership. Isaias Afwerki, he believes, understands the problems of a unilateral declaration of independence. He is also keenly aware, he believes, of the potential divisions within the Eritrean population which are likely to surface as soon as the fight against the Derg is won…”
These views of Isaias have surfaced over the years. Most recently, during his interview with Eritrea’s state broadcaster, he opined “South Sudan should not have declared independence”. It is this political vision that put him on a collision course with TPLF, among many other reasons. This is because TPLF has a long-held belief that ethnicities should have a right to secede, and it went as far as embedding that concept in Ethiopian constitution, following the Soviet Union model, although arguably with a similarly questionable level of commitment to accepting secessionism in practice. In several interviews, Isaias has said that he advised TPLF against legalising secession.
After 1998, Isaias hosted a plethora of insurgents in Eritrea that fought the Ethiopian government led by a ruling front whose core was TPLF. Prominent among them were groups bitterly opposed to the federal constitution that allows, in theory, for ethnic groups to secede, if they choose to, and also grants them the right to pursue a higher grade of administrative status within the federation.
Rather than being concerned about self-determination rights for substate nationalists, Eritrean observers believe that Isaias has a grand vision of uniting the region, envisioning himself at the Horn’s helm. And he also believes that the biggest obstacle to the realisation of this vision is TPLF. Hence, the irreconcilable enmity.
In 2018, it seems that Isaias felt he had found a partner to implement his ‘vision’ in the newly minted Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. One of the insurgent groups he hosted, and many believe aligns with his regional vision, is Ginbot 7. This organisation was among the first to embrace Abiy. In fact, Andargachew Tsige, one of its top leaders, has said he was the one who convinced Isaias that Abiy is a person to be trusted.
Since, Ginbot 7, and similar groups that are enemies of TPLF, have become cozy with Abiy’s government. Such alliances, however, only heightened TPLF suspicion and its feeling of encirclement, and have contributed to a rise in Tigrayan solidarity that has benefited the otherwise embattled ruling party.
Following the shallow 2018 Ethiopia-Eritrea deal that earned Abiy a Nobel Peace Prize, Isaias made TPLF a target of political attacks accompanied by vitriolic rhetoric. As the months went by, the attacks got bolder. It may seem strange for a national leader to target a political party of a neighbouring country that is not in power, and it is alarming for TPLF that Abiy and allies have given tacit approval and at times encouragement of these attacks. But, to a keen observer of Ethiopian and Eritrean politics, there is nothing particularly surprising about the developments.
Tigray and a large chunk of Eritrea share the same ethnicity, culture, language, historical background, familial ties and psychological makeup. With such close relations spawned over centuries, it is inevitable that the social and political paths of the two people cross, whether they live under one or two states. Couple that with Isaias’ bitter history with the TPLF, tendency to personalize politics, and his grandiose regional ambitions, and you can see this coming.
What is different this time is Abiy and his allies’ eagerness to exploit the division between TPLF and Isaias to achieve their own goal of neutralizing their domestic adversary, TPLF. It appears that ensuring TPLF’s submission is worth a huge gamble for Abiy. Normally, a leader who obsessively tries to curate his public image would not risk such a close association with a brutal autocrat like Isaias, who heads a regime whose officials are accused by UN investigators of selling the kidneys of their own fleeing citizens.
But, rather than distancing himself, Abiy has literally embraced the dictator. In comparison to the normal diplomatic protocol, it is embarrassingly affectionate. According to Eritrean observers, the bizarre behavior is explained by Isaias’ determination to exact revenge against TPLF for defeating and isolating Eritrea and to realize his long-held political vision for the horn of Africa—and Abiy’s apparent support for these goals.
Ephrem Aferom, an Eritrean research fellow at Mary Washington University in Fredericksburg, in Virginia says “..Isaias Afwerki has never lived without conflict, scheme and conspiracy in his entire adult life. A sustainable peace cannot be forged with such an individual addicted to chaos. The ‘peace’ between Eritrea and Ethiopia was supposed to bring change, particularly to the Eritrean people. Indeed, Isaias may have realized eventually it may, whether he likes it or not. Therefore, he chose to create enmity with Tigray to continue with the status quo and to satisfy his addiction to chaos…”
Another Eritrean activist and political analyst, Saleh Younis, believes that “The Eritrea – Ethiopia peace agreement was a “get out of jail” card for Isaias Afwerki who had narrowly evaded a referral to the ICC for committing Crimes Against Humanity. It is a peace with no peace dividend for Eritreans. Before the peace treaty, Eritreans could at least console themselves by saying at least the international community is aware of our plight. No more. The world so wants Abiy to succeed they are indulging his blind spots, including Isaias Afwerki. But given the nature of Isaias, that is temporary: only a matter of time before he reminds them why they hate him….”
In his last interview with Eritrea’s state media, Eri TV, Isaias said that he would not sit with his hands folded when it comes to Ethiopian affairs. Again, it is rare to hear a leader of a nation that is barely thirty-years-old with less than a population of five million talk about a nation twenty times larger in such a manner. But, this is Isaias. He has shown a similar tendency in the past by destabilizing neighboring countries: Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.
That is a major reason why TPLF is wary of his threat. Therefore, its response was swift. In a speech to mark the 45th anniversary of the founding of the party, the region’s head Debretsion Gebremichael called on “..Ethiopian parliamentarians to condemn the threat that their fellow citizens are confronting or they might as well declare Tigray is not part of Ethiopia, since they chose to be silent, when a foreign leader threatens it..” That was also a thinly veiled jab at Abiy for ‘bromancing’ with a man who is threatening part of the country he leads.
Debretsion also called on members of the Eritrean army to defect: “…should they choose to come to Tigray, they will be welcomed…” Such a call seems intended to strike at Isaias’ Achilles Heel: the Eritrean army is filled with young conscripts who are well-known for fleeing from his grip to as far away as across the Mediterranean. They need very little encouragement to continue what they have been doing for years and so leave the army even more weak and vulnerable.
Should such tit-for-tat between TPLF and Isaias continue, we may be in for another devastating cycle of conflict, or even possibly the disintegration of Ethiopia. Nobel Peace Prize or not, Abiy’s inability to correctly choose between protecting a region of his own country or cuddling a newfound foreign friend, known the world over for his cruelty against his own people, may cost him dearly.
Follow us on Twitter @EthiopiaInsight and join our Telegram channel here
This is the author’s viewpoint. However, Ethiopia Insight will correct clear factual errors.
Editor: William Davison, Martin Plaut
Main photo: Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and President Isaias Afwerki.
Published under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence. Cite Ethiopia Insight and link to this page if republished.
19 Aug 2019 Ethiopia and Eritrea’s peace must be rooted in past
28 Apr 2019 Charting a way forward for Eritrea
1 Feb2019 Ethiopia’s transitional justice process needs restoration work
17 Jan 2019 Is Tigray really a drop in the bucket for Abiy’s administration?
28 Oct 2018 After Eritrea thaw, Tigray’s southern border with Amhara heats up
So this page censors comments? Lol
Naty Berhane thank you for this well analyzed report.
Keep on dreaming.. The last 2 years has been the most successful time for Tigray and TPLF. But enemies still dreaming the failure of TIGRAY. Tigray never ever nill down. Esayas is the one counting down his days.
“Those who analyzed the cause of that war tend to agree that the personality and political vision of President Isaias had a lot to do with the descent into war.”
Wonder who those analysts could be and who is behind this article?
I think this article has several misleading intonation and information that quickly renders its credibility questionable. It appears more of a propaganda piece than an honest and fair analysis.
It would be convincing if you support claims with your evidences. Otherwise its just a bulff.
Eritrea & ethiopian governments will continue to cooperate with each other for mutual benefit.
2 objectives of Eritrea:
1) The town of Badme will be returned to Eritrea.
2) Tplf terrorist organization must be neutralized so that the region can progress
This all-consuming obsession about TPLF seems to go beyond the political. It has become pathological – an irrational political disorder not conducive for peace.
Thanks great ideas
To make long story short, Ethiopian masses could care less about these ethnic sycophants as long as they stay away from meddling in their affairs. People are tired and have enough of their self-selving intrigues over very 50 years. Second, their political predicment now seems a scene straight from National Geographic episodes where an snake struggles and tries to overpower and eventually swallow another snake regardless. Third, the TPLF clique, in tandem with the advise or support of Isias and his EPLF political outfit , never had intention or had faith in real ethnic federalism or right to secession. It was all about political ploy and opportunim to sooth and hoodwink other nationalities from get go. That a golden opportunity afforded them to solidify the power in Addis and get political cover in 1991. Fourth, of the two transient rivals Mr. Isias poses more threat to Ethiopia than than its transient foe because he is more experienced and proven willy despot of small impoverished nation armed with international diplomatic clout. He still have some ambition or political fantasies while woyane are basically isolated, spent shell and failed political entity. Fifth, the likes of political neophyte of Abye should think twice before trusting or playing political favours with one side or the other. Even though chances of Tigrain to returning to power is slim , if not zero, in the foreseeable future, they are equally pose tricky situation to any novice leader seating in Arat Kilo in terms of their political double-dealings, intrigues and networking afforded by thirty years of hard knocks, opulence and political and/or power corruption.
In December 2019 the lead member of the Norwegian prize committee said the peace process seemed to have stalled. One main reason is that there is too much obsession and animosity about TPLF, on both sides of the border. Which means the so-called peace is a sham at the border, and that essentially makes it a sham at the core – a travesty in the horn of Africa.
I say, on top of being twisted, you are spending too much time with spent people like Younis.
1. You totally forgot the elephant in the middle. i.e. The border demarcation and the fact that your TPLF is holding both countries hostage as it is using it as a life line.
2. Since the peace agreement between Eritrea and Ethiopia includes the demarcation of their common border that both Eritrea (for 18 years now ) and Ethiopia (just now) accepted the ruling without any condition .
3. It is President Isayas’s obligation to indicate the reason blocking the implementation of the border ruling. That happened to be TPLF. Meaning PIA was not talking about Ethiopian affairs, nor does he have any obsession or enmity with TPLF , this is Eritrea’s matter as well. You mean a dispute that wasted 100000 people is not a concern to both Eritrea and Ethiopia ?
4. It is not a secret that TPLF is deifying the Federal Government of Ethiopia on the border and on other issues. Meaning TPLF is rouge. So, why should the Federal government defend it and from what ? All Eritrea stated was a fact. TPLF is blocking the demarcation and holding the peace process hostage. Had the Federal Government being strong and in control, it would have dealt with TPLF the way it sees fit and there would have been no need for Eritrea to mention TPLF at all. Sop this bullshit that PIA has some issue with TPLF. Eritrea as a whole has an issue with TPLF. It wasted 27 years trying to kill Eritrea and drive its people to submission. If you think the Eritrean people would forget that or this is just PIA’s issue, think again
5. PIA did not say he will interfere in Ethiopia’s affairs. All he said was, it is to Eritrea’s best interest to safeguard the peace process just started between Eritrea and Ethiopia. One way to do that is to give the Federal Government a breathing space – for it to deal with its internal issues (mainly TPLF & some other fanatics popping up to disrupt the reform going on within Ethiopia) – meaning , knowing that it was TPLF who is holding the border demarcation, Eritrea would not pressure the Federal government to demarcate the border immediately, thus putting it under the mercy of TPLF (as the dispute area is within Tigray region, but still a Federal Government affair not TPLF’s) . Now tell me – how is that in any way considered as interfering in Ethiopia’s affairs ? and how the hell would that make you reach in to that stupid conclusion that PIA has issue with TPLF ?
6. That thing you said about the cultural relationship, maily link between Eritrea and Tigray, can’t be the furthest from the truth. Get this : if Eritrea has an enemy ever in this wide world, TPLF (and its host Tigray) would be it. Since its creation, mostly it was the Tigray rulers who were abusing the Eritrean people. From cutting Eritreans’ feet during the war with Italy, all the way – by being ISEPA and Kinet – and spy within Eritrea proper during Derg era, up to when TPLF was in power and worked day and night to dismantle Eritrea from its core. So, Eritrea has relationship with all its neighbors, but it has only one evil enemy and it is the one to the south. So get your head out of your ass. Tigray is Ethiopia and your family, but nothing to Eritrea
7. What Eritrea wants is this : A neighboring Ethiopia at peace with itself and willing to have a peaceful relationship with Eritrea, one based on respect of sovereignty & territorial integrity. That is all. It doesn’t matter who is leading Ethiopia as long as it is willing to have that kind of relationship with Eritrea.
Obviously you are not a member of the “Yiakl” (Enough) movement – you are too busy fulminating about TPLF.
Yiakl is a joke; they have zero support in Eritrea
Eshohen beshoh. Abiy will not be on power for a year, had he not did what he did. enamy of enamy could be a valuable friend, proven to be true.
This is a well articulated piece and much appreciated. You have hit the nail on what the Mad man isayas’s tactics and the current plight of the Eritrean people are. One thing I would like to add is that Isayas has a dream of being the King of Abysinia. His family are related to the chiefs and semi Kings of Tigray and Isayas doesnt have 1% of Eritrean DNA. Thus the cruelty he imposes on Eritreans the likes the world hasnt seen since Mao and Stalin. I can tell you more about his agenda and who he is. The reason he fell out with Meles is becouse Meles refused him to be President of Ethiopia at the expense of all the blood shed for Eritrean Independence. Aby does not care. So isayas will try selling Eritrean port access in exchange of uniting eritrea with ethiopia and to rule both. The sudden facination with Haile Sellasie..and Menelik and the Ethiopian so called dynasty of the last two years was pushed by Isayas for his grand mussion. He was actually a spy sent by Haile Selassie to kill Eritrean Independence. He led by murdering..kidnapping and arresting dissent from within the struggle. Crazy man!!
A novel peace prize winner with out peace will be the first prime minister in history who conspired to attack his country’s in collaboration with neighboring country.
Professionally, add the title (PhD) to Debrtsion Gebremichael!